<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic LUMIX G1 – 40% smaller than a standard DSLR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techlounge.co.uk/535/panasonic-lumix-g1-%e2%80%93-40-smaller-than-a-standard-dslr.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techlounge.co.uk/535/panasonic-lumix-g1-%e2%80%93-40-smaller-than-a-standard-dslr.html</link>
	<description>Latest Gadgets on the Net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.techlounge.co.uk/535/panasonic-lumix-g1-%e2%80%93-40-smaller-than-a-standard-dslr.html/comment-page-1#comment-437736</link>
		<dc:creator>John Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techlounge.co.uk/535/panasonic-lumix-g1-%e2%80%93-40-smaller-than-a-standard-dslr.html#comment-437736</guid>
		<description>The casings just look really cheap. and for the money your half way to a nicer canon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The casings just look really cheap. and for the money your half way to a nicer canon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
